logo
HOME  |  BACKGROUND |  MEMBERS  |  NEWS  |  FEEDBACK | Matériaux en français
Background

Background > NAFTA challenge over Trusts reinforces investor anger with Feds

Media Release

 

NAFTA challenge over Trusts reinforces investor anger with Feds

Calgary, AB – October 30, 2007: The Harper government is facing a NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) challenge by two American trust investors.  Their Notice of Intent to Submit a Claim to Arbitration under NAFTA is based on Finance Minister Jim Flaherty’s surprise Halloween 2006 decision to eliminate income trusts on the heels of the Conservative government’s election pledge to leave the trust structure alone. The unexpected change caused investor losses of $35 billion, and it is estimated that American investors represent over $5 billion of that loss.

“This Halloween surprise to government is just one more example on how the Harper government did not do their homework when deciding to tax trusts,” said Gord Kerr, Vice Chairman of the Coalition of Canadian Energy Trusts and CEO and President of Enerplus Resources Fund. “It has been a full year since the so called Tax Fairness Plan announcement and, one year later, repercussions and unintended consequences continue to be felt throughout Canada, not to mention the devastation being felt by energy trusts and investors.”

“Furthermore, the federal government’s lack of consultation with energy trusts compounds the growing uncertainty investors face when doing business in Canada,” said Kerr.

In December 2006, the Coalition issued a comprehensive report on the impacts to trusts. The detailed report included facts to illustrate that:

  • There is, and remains, no firm evidence that tax leakage occurred from the status quo tax treatment of trusts;
  • There is strong evidence that energy trusts have actually enhanced government revenue and are a major contributing factor to a strong federal budget surplus;
  • There is irrefutable evidence that energy trusts enhance productivity from mature assets; and
  • The trust model is most suitable for the mid-cap sector of the rapidly maturing Canadian sedimentary basin.

The report also highlighted unintended consequences of the broken promise which have now become fact. These include:

  • Massive capital losses to millions of Canadians;
  • Lost income for millions of Canadians depending on investments for income;
  • A ripple effect of reduced spending and lost investment for millions of Canadians, including investment in charitable organizations; and
  • Exposing Canadian corporations to leveraged buy-out groups, notably by foreign controlled companies.

“Our report holds true today as it did nearly a year ago, and it is supported by a wide range of experts,” said Kerr. “Yet the government has still not responded to our report nor presented any evidence that supports their position.”

The government has ignored the pleas of thousands of Canadians to revisit its position while steadfastly refusing to admit mistakes were made. The NAFTA challenge presents the government with a very serious problem—one that could cost Canadians untold dollars, potentially in the billions.

“It is unfortunate this same NAFTA opportunity to challenge the government is not available to Canadians,” said Kerr.

Likely hundreds of thousands of hard earned taxpayer dollars will be used to defend this NAFTA challenge. And if the Harper government is not successful, Canadians will be gravely impacted. 

 -end-

 

For further information:

NATIONAL Public Relations

Daorcey LeBray

403.531.0331

dlebray@national.ca

 

Back to top /\

© 2006 Coalition of Canadian Energy Trusts, All rights reserved | Privacy